ADHD and Dopamine
The current, generally accepted belief is that ADHD (attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder) is caused by a dopamine imbalance within the brain. However, there is controversy as to whether ADHD is caused by hypodopaminergic functioning or hyperdopaminergic. There are several reasons for this theory. First of all, amongst other things, dopamine is often related to attention and motivation. Another reason is due to the effectiveness of methylphenidate based medication (a.k.a. meth salts). Methylphenidate acts as an dopamine reuptake inhibitor by blocking dopamine transporters. Thus there is more dopamine in the neurons, but the dopamine fires less often.
CD and ADHD
Conduct disorder (CD) is characteristic of socially disruptive, aggressive and usually destructive behavior. Destructive not only to property and others, but to one's own daily life. ADHD is very similar to CD, except there tend to be far less violent tendencies, if any. However, like CD, ADHD can be inhibit one's academic career, occupation, or even social ability. It is believed that CD and ADHD are in essence the same on a neurobiological level, and the only difference comes in upbringing. Individuals who grow up in a high-risk environment are more likely to develop CD rather than ADHD, and visa-versa for a low risk environment. Indeed, the two are so similar that CD is classified as a type of ADHD.
Objective
The objective of Gatzke-Kopp et al's experiment was to try and determine whether ADHD/CD and thus other externalizing disorders such as antisocial personality disorder and borderline personality disorder. The original objective was to compare neurological differences between people with CD and ADHD when dealing with rewards and reward anticipation, however it rather quickly became apparent that this would not be possible since ADHD and CD were so similar. A reward based approach was used because both ADHD and CD are often characterized by impulsivity, that is, the inability to defer gratification, even if doing so will result in a greater reward. In the end, it was decided to use a control group of individuals with no mental disorders. Only males were used because of the small sample size.
Procedure
A sample of twenty-one males between the ages of twelve and sixteen with ADHD/CD were chosen as the experimental group. This was later reduced to nineteen because two of the participants were unable to stay still enough for long enough. A control group of eleven males of the same ages with no mental disorders was also chosen. Any individuals taking any sort of stimulant medication were asked to dis continue use at least thirty-six hours before the test. Previous experiments have shown that there is no appreciable difference between individuals with ADHD who have never taken stimulants, and one who has stopped taking them for thrity-six hours.
Both groups were asked to play three rounds of a simple game. A green square was flashed for 1.2 seconds on either the left or right side (chosen psuedorandomly). The participant would then have to press the appropriate button. If the answer was correct, and a monetary reward was given, then a tone was played for half a second; if the answer was correct, and no reward was given, then a different tone was played for half a second. If the answer was incorrect, then there was no adverse affect.
The game had three rounds. The first round any and all correct answers resulted in a forty cent reward. In the second round, no money was ever rewarded, and in the final round, money was rewarded only part of the time.
Results
The results from the fMRI showed that during the first round when a monetary reward was given, both the control group and the experimental group showed increased activity in their striatum in both the left and right hemispheres. The striatum is a part of the basal ganglia, and is most often associated with motor functions (e.g. movement planning), however, it also deals with executive functioning, reward anticipation, and the processing of unique or novel stimuli. The area is also comprised mainly of medium spiny neurons, which are heavy with dopamine (figure 1).
However, during the non-monetary portion, the control group's anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) was highly activated, however, in the experimental group, the striatum continued to be highly activated. Amongst other things the ACC is used for motivation, task anticipation and error detection. (figure 2 and figure 3)
Conclusions
Ultimately, the experiment did not resolve the hypodopaminergic versus hyperdopaminergic debate. While is is true that dopamine is far more prevelant in the striatum than the ACC, there is no garantee that the neurotransmitter being used is indeed dopamine, since fMRI's can only detect brain activity and not which neurotransmitter is being used.
However, this experiment can give us a great deal of insight into other symptoms of ADHD/CD. The activation of the striatum may help explain the impulsivity of individuals with ADHD/CD. Because the striatum is involved with reward anticipation, its continued activation could mean that the anticipation in someone with ADHD/CD is much greater than in a normal individual, and thus much harder to resist.
It is also interesting to note the lack of activation of the ACC. The ACC is important for error detection and error correction, and thus reinforcement learning (i.e. learning from ones mistakes). This could explain, at least to some degree, why people with ADHD are often disturbing, since they would not have learned to control themselves despite being scolded; perhaps more obviously, though, it may help explain the aggressive tendencies, usually socially related, of individuals with CD in a similar, but more pronounced, way it explains the ADHD disruptive behavior.
References
Gatzke-Kopp, Lisa et al. Neurological Correlates of Reward Responding in Adolescents With and Without Externalizing Behavior Disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. Vol. 18 N.1(2009)
Wikipedia. "File:Dopamineseratonin.gif". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dopamineseratonin.gif
Wikipedia. "Methylphenidate". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methylphenidate
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Monday, April 27, 2009
Could LSD cure your OCD?
(Could 'shrooms' make you less afraid of death?)
When a person is diagnosed with terminal cancer it can result in a drastic change in their behavior as well their outlook on life. Often times the fear of death will overwhelm a patient and they will suffer from chronic depression and anxiety. In 2001 the National Cancer Policy Board of the Institute of Medicine released a search for “novel” approaches to palliative treatment. Palliative treatment is the search for a type of medical care that alleviates or reduces a patient’s emotional and psychological suffering as a result of their terminal illness. Dr. Charles Griffiths, of John Hopkins University responded to this search. He suggested an exploration of the hallucinogenic drug Psilocybin. His hope was that the experience on this drug would reduce a person’s anxiety about their impending death as well as minimize their desire for pain medication. Although the drug will not lessen the physical pain caused by the illness, Girffiths suspects that the patient’s attitude and outlook will change dramatically as a result of the experience, ensuing in a changed perception of their pain.
PSILOCYBIN AND ITS EFFECT ON THE BRAIN:
Psilocybin is a hallucinogenic drug found in psilocybin mushrooms (commonly called ‘magic mushrooms’ or ‘shrooms’). Hallucinogens are generally divided into two groups of alkaloids, tryptamines: including drugs such as Psilocybin, DMT and LSD and phenthylamines: such as mescaline. Tryptamines are a type of alkaloid, generally found in plants, animals and fungi. Hallucinogens, such as Psilocybin have been present in religious ceremonies for hundreds of years. Generally these drugs are restricted by indigenous cultures for highly ritualized sacramental and healing ceremonies.
Psilocybin has the ability to profoundly change one’s state of consciousness. Effects of consumption may include a distorted perception resulting in somatic, visual, olfactory, gustatory and auditory hallucinations. Consumption may also produce a synthesis of random sensory experiences such as ‘tasting colours’. The effects listed are common in serotonergically mediated hallucinogens. These are those receptors that exert their influence on the same receptors that respond to serotonin. The brain receptor that is affected by Psilocybin is called 5-HT2A which is widely dispersed throughout the central nervous system, specifically in serotonin rich areas such as the prefrontal, parietal and somatosensory cortex. Hallucinogens such as LSD and Psilocybin act as full/partial agonists at this receptor, causing an increase in this receptors activity.
Fig. 2 Shows the activation sequence for motor activity and demonstrates the thalamus and its role with the aspects of the prefrontal cortex.
Griffiths’s desire was to research whether profound activation of the serotonin receptor could result in what is considered a primary mystical experience. He also wanted to study whether this experience could have lasting effects on a patient’s attitude toward their illness and their fate. Griffiths organized a double blind study comparing the effects of orally administrated Psilocybin and Methylphenidate (often referred to as Ritalin, a psycho-stimulant prescribed for ADHD and narcolepsy that has a similar onset and duration as Psilocybin).
http://www.blogsforcompanies.com/TTimages/psilocybin_research_study.jpg
The study was designed so that measures were taken, during the drug session, 7 hours after ingestion, two months after ingestion and finally, 14 months after their first Psilocybin trip. The 2 month and 14 month follow up survey assessed altered states of mind, sensitivity to hallucinogen, the scale of one’s mystical experience, changes in attitude and behaviour, spiritual transcendence and personality factors such as neuroticism and openness. Finally, three adults who had been submitted by the participant answered a questionnaire on the participant’s behavior since the experiment.
(Could 'shrooms' make you less afraid of death?)
When a person is diagnosed with terminal cancer it can result in a drastic change in their behavior as well their outlook on life. Often times the fear of death will overwhelm a patient and they will suffer from chronic depression and anxiety. In 2001 the National Cancer Policy Board of the Institute of Medicine released a search for “novel” approaches to palliative treatment. Palliative treatment is the search for a type of medical care that alleviates or reduces a patient’s emotional and psychological suffering as a result of their terminal illness. Dr. Charles Griffiths, of John Hopkins University responded to this search. He suggested an exploration of the hallucinogenic drug Psilocybin. His hope was that the experience on this drug would reduce a person’s anxiety about their impending death as well as minimize their desire for pain medication. Although the drug will not lessen the physical pain caused by the illness, Girffiths suspects that the patient’s attitude and outlook will change dramatically as a result of the experience, ensuing in a changed perception of their pain.
PSILOCYBIN AND ITS EFFECT ON THE BRAIN:
Psilocybin is a hallucinogenic drug found in psilocybin mushrooms (commonly called ‘magic mushrooms’ or ‘shrooms’). Hallucinogens are generally divided into two groups of alkaloids, tryptamines: including drugs such as Psilocybin, DMT and LSD and phenthylamines: such as mescaline. Tryptamines are a type of alkaloid, generally found in plants, animals and fungi. Hallucinogens, such as Psilocybin have been present in religious ceremonies for hundreds of years. Generally these drugs are restricted by indigenous cultures for highly ritualized sacramental and healing ceremonies.
Psilocybin has the ability to profoundly change one’s state of consciousness. Effects of consumption may include a distorted perception resulting in somatic, visual, olfactory, gustatory and auditory hallucinations. Consumption may also produce a synthesis of random sensory experiences such as ‘tasting colours’. The effects listed are common in serotonergically mediated hallucinogens. These are those receptors that exert their influence on the same receptors that respond to serotonin. The brain receptor that is affected by Psilocybin is called 5-HT2A which is widely dispersed throughout the central nervous system, specifically in serotonin rich areas such as the prefrontal, parietal and somatosensory cortex. Hallucinogens such as LSD and Psilocybin act as full/partial agonists at this receptor, causing an increase in this receptors activity.
Fig.1 The distribution of Serotonin in the brain.
Psilocybin and other hallucinogens are proven to stimulate specific areas of the brain. PET scans show the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala are affected by Psilocybin. The effect on the amygdala explains the heightened emotions one experiences on a Psilocybin 'trip', the prefrontal cortex is responsible for our executive functions and this explains effects on our personality and on our ability to organize thoughts and actions.
There is a great deal of speculation that the thalamus is intensely affected by hallucinogens. The thalamus is a relay station for the previously mentioned 2HT serotonin receptors. It is also responsible for receiving auditory, somatosensory and visual sensory signs. It then sends these sensory signals to the cerebral cortex. If the thalamus were overwhelmed, it may no longer be able to filter through the sensory information properly. This would mean that the prefrontal cortex would be inundated with sensory information. This avalanche of sensory data may be what leads to changes in our behaviour and perception.
Psilocybin and other hallucinogens are proven to stimulate specific areas of the brain. PET scans show the prefrontal cortex and the amygdala are affected by Psilocybin. The effect on the amygdala explains the heightened emotions one experiences on a Psilocybin 'trip', the prefrontal cortex is responsible for our executive functions and this explains effects on our personality and on our ability to organize thoughts and actions.
There is a great deal of speculation that the thalamus is intensely affected by hallucinogens. The thalamus is a relay station for the previously mentioned 2HT serotonin receptors. It is also responsible for receiving auditory, somatosensory and visual sensory signs. It then sends these sensory signals to the cerebral cortex. If the thalamus were overwhelmed, it may no longer be able to filter through the sensory information properly. This would mean that the prefrontal cortex would be inundated with sensory information. This avalanche of sensory data may be what leads to changes in our behaviour and perception.
Fig. 2 Shows the activation sequence for motor activity and demonstrates the thalamus and its role with the aspects of the prefrontal cortex.
THE STUDY:
Griffiths’s desire was to research whether profound activation of the serotonin receptor could result in what is considered a primary mystical experience. He also wanted to study whether this experience could have lasting effects on a patient’s attitude toward their illness and their fate. Griffiths organized a double blind study comparing the effects of orally administrated Psilocybin and Methylphenidate (often referred to as Ritalin, a psycho-stimulant prescribed for ADHD and narcolepsy that has a similar onset and duration as Psilocybin).
The study involved two or three 8 hour drug sessions conducted at 2 month intervals. Thirty-six volunteers aged between twenty-four and sixty-four years were involved. Volunteers were all physically and psychologically healthy, had no previous experience with hallucinogens and were affiliated with some sort of religion/spirituality. Participants were required to have religious/spiritual connections because Griffiths felt it would, “better equip volunteers to understand and consolidate any mystical-type experiences they might have in the study.” Thirty of the thirty-six participants were divided into two groups. On their first drug session the group received a dose of either Methylphenidate or Psilocybin, the alternative drug was administrated to them during their second session. The 8hr drug sessions were conducted in a room designed to replicate a living room.
http://www.blogsforcompanies.com/TTimages/psilocybin_research_study.jpg
Fig.3 The location used for the experiment, a room made to look like a living room.
This comfortable space was to ensure physical safety and a relaxing environment that would not seem threatening in case of hallucinations/perceptual changes. During each drug session the participant was accompanied by two monitors. Sessions were videotaped and participants were encouraged to listen to music, lie down on a couch and wear an eye-mask. In order to decrease the effects of this “expectancy” both the monitor and the subject were “blinded” to what drug was being consumed. Not only that, but a ‘red herring’ group of 6 participants who only received a placebo, but were informed that they had consumed Psilocybin on their third drug session, were a part of the study.
RESULTS:
RESULTS:
The study was designed so that measures were taken, during the drug session, 7 hours after ingestion, two months after ingestion and finally, 14 months after their first Psilocybin trip. The 2 month and 14 month follow up survey assessed altered states of mind, sensitivity to hallucinogen, the scale of one’s mystical experience, changes in attitude and behaviour, spiritual transcendence and personality factors such as neuroticism and openness. Finally, three adults who had been submitted by the participant answered a questionnaire on the participant’s behavior since the experiment.
The most striking result from the survey done 7 hours after drug ingestion, was from the measure of mystical experience questionnaire. This showed that 22 of the 36 volunteers fulfilled the criteria for a ‘complete mystical experience’ as defined by Pahnke and Richards. Findings from the questionnaire 2-months after the drug was ingested express that Psilocybin significantly increased ratings of mood, behaviour, positive attitude and social effect. Sixty seven percent of the participants went on to list their experience on Psilocybin to be one of the most meaningful experiences of their lives or among the top five most meaningful experiences they have ever had.
Fig. 4 Graphs demonstrating results from the 2 month survey and the 14 month survey, comparing the Psilocybin experience and effects with the Methylphenidate experience and effect.
The 14 month follow up survey showed that 64% of the patients indicated the experience as increasing their life satisfaction and well being moderately or very much. Furthermore, 61% described the experience as being associated with significant or extreme, positive changes in behaviour and attitude, since the first session. Since the Psilocybin experience, the volunteers rated low on neuroticism and negative affect and high on extroversion, openness, agreeableness and measure of actualization potential, this rating is based on adult norms. Quotes from the verbatim study that was taken included:
- The experience expanded my conscious awareness permanently...I accept 'what is', more easily.
- That in every horrible or frightening experience, if you stay with it, enter into it, you will find God...It has become a guiding principal in my life.
- I experienced the utter joy of letting go-without anxiety-without direction-beyond ego.
WHAT THIS MEANS:
These results certify that under the correct conditions, Psilocybin is able to be administered safely and that it will successfully produce occurrences similar to spontaneous mystical experiences. The information also confirms that these experiences have a proven long-term positive effect on the lives of participants. Griffith’s hope is to continue his research as this study is only at its preliminary stages. Already, the search for terminal cancer patients, suffering from depression and anxiety and willing to try Psilocybin has begun. He is also hopeful that this drug may aid in treating drug dependency. This is partially inspired by a Canadian study, from the 60’s, that attempted (with some success) to cure alcoholism with Mescaline and LSD.
Griffiths also wishes to investigate the importance of using volunteers with some sort of religious/spiritual connection in order to successfully achieve a ‘mystical experience’ that has long-term effects. Not only does this experiment aid Dr. Griffiths’ own research but it also is helping to re-open the exploration of psychedelic drugs and their potential for the medical world. Studies of these drugs have been off limits for the last few decades, due to their role in the 60’s counter culture, but with the success of experiments like this one, other more radical experiments are being approved, such as a study at UCLA researching LSD and if it could help people with extreme cases of OCD.
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Lie To Me
Background
Relevant Parts of the Brain
Anterior Cingulate Cortex:
- Connected with the prefrontal and parietal cortex
- Regulates autonomic function including blood pressure and heart rate
- Also involved in rational cognitive functions such as reward-anticipation, decision making, empathy and emotion
Dorsal Lateral Prefrontal Cortex:
- Responsible for motor planning, organization and regulation
- Associated with Working-memory; the storage and manipulation of information
The Parietal Cortex:
- Determination of spatial sense and navigation
The Polygraph
- Inadmissible in court
- Federal Polygraph Handbook:
- Question Form - Be clear and concise; Avoid legal terms when possible; Be constructed so that they may be answered yes or no; Not be worded in the form of an accusation or contain an inference that presupposes knowledge or guilt; In specific issue tests when testing for multiple items or amounts of money, use the phrase, "any of', e.g., "Did you steal any of that money?"; In specific issue tests, only address one issue in each question; In specific issue tests, only address one incident in each series.
- Question Type - Primary Relevant. This question tests the possible direct involvement of the examinee. In PDD screening questioning formats, all relevant questions are considered primary relevant questions;
- Secondary Relevant. This question tests the examinee's possible involvement in the
offense under investigation. A secondary relevant question should be constructed to address a secondary issue such as help, plan, or participate; test for secondary involvement in, such as seeing, hearing, or knowing; or focus on the nature or location of evidence and/or physical acts that support the primary offense. There are three types of secondary relevant questions: - 1. Evidence-Connecting. An evidence-connecting question is designed to
determine if the examinee was involved with any of the evidence of the crime or is aware of the nature or location of various items of evidence.
Do you know where any of that money is now? - 2. Guilty-Knowledge. A guilty-knowledge relevant question is used to determine
if the examinee has any knowledge of who committed the incident under investigation.
- 3. Secondary-Involvement. A secondary-involvement relevant question tests for
secondary involvement such as seeing or hearing or focuses on physical acts that support the primary offense.
- Comparison Question. Physiological responses of comparison questions are
compared to physiological responses of relevant questions. The comparison question is designed to produce a greater physiological response for the non-deceptive person. The probable lie and directed lie questions are the two types of comparison questions used within the Federal Government. - 1. Probable-Lie Comparison Question. This question is designed to be a probable lie
for the examinee. The PLC question should be similar in nature but unrelated by time, place or category to the specific issue. However, in screening examinations the PLC can be related to the issue(s) as long as the screening comparison question establishes a dichotomy between the relevant and comparison issues. A comparison question should be broad in scope and time so that it captures as many of the examinee's past life experiences as possible. The physiological responses to the PLC are compared to the responses of the designated relevant questions. The exclusionary and screening comparison questions are the two types of PLC questions used within the federal government.
- 2. Exclusionary Comparison Question (ECQ). A probable-lie question
should be similar in nature but unrelated to the issue being tested. The question should be
separated from the relevant issue by time, place or category. The comparison question should use the same action verb or similar in nature action verb as that of the relevant issue. A comparison question should be broad in scope and time so that it captures as many of the examinee's past life experiences as possible.
- Directed-Lie Comparison. The DLC question is a specialized comparison
question. A properly constructed DLC question involves a minor transgression which should have some personal significance to the examinee. Upon acknowledging having committed such a transgression, the examinee is directed to lie when asked that question on the test. The question is separated from the relevant issue by category.
- Sacrifice Relevant Question. When used, this is the first question that refers to the
relevant issue, and it prepares the examinee for the introduction of the relevant questions.
Sacrifice relevant questions are not scored during the test data analysis phase of a PDD
examination.
- Symptomatic Question. This question is designed to test for an outside issue that
could be more significant for an examinee than the relevant and comparison issues. Symptomatic question responses are evaluated, though not numerically scored, during the test data analysis phase of a PDD examination.
- Stimulus Questions: designed to measure capacity for response. These can be relevant or irrelevant:
Were you on that bridge that night?
- What do the question formats mean?
- The yes/no format means the linguistic construction is always in the hand of the examiner, not the examinee.
- The built in shifts from relevant to irrelevant to comparison and control questions indicate an acknowledgment of the difficulty of maintaining accuracy and control in the testing environment.
- Problems with the Polygraph:
- For instance, using the Directed-Lie Comparison question as an example of how the subject lies poses several real problems since Polygraph measures physiological response and not neurological response. The form of a directed lie question dictates that the subject is instructed to lie. The point of polygraph is to discern a lie based on a spike in stress levels resulting from the concealment of a lie. The Comparison question removes the element of concealment and therefore removes exactly what the examiner wishes to observe: the effects of concealment.
- The problems with Polygraph tests are well known to most people today, they measure stress without having a way of differentiating between the stress caused by crafting a lie and the stress caused by being subjected to a polygraph.
- Langleben: "Its specificity is limited because it relies on the correlates of peripheral nervous system activity, while deception in a cognition event with top-down control by the central nervous system"
- This is the shift his research is trying to make: from physiology to cognition.
The Experiment
Subjects: 23 right-handed male undergraduate students (mean age: 19.36)
Task: A modification of the Guilty Knowledge Task (GKT)
- Instruction Protocol:
- Participants were given an envelope with two playing cards, a 5 of clubs and a 7 of spades, along with $20.
- The investigator instructed the participants to deny possession of one of the cards and acknowledge possession of the other during the imaging phase.
- Participants were told they could keep the money only if they successfully concealed the identity of the lie card during the scan session.
- A third party then led them to the scanner and instructed them to answer each question as truthfully as possible.
- A sequence of photographed playing cards was presented
- The series of cards included five stimulus classes:
- 1. Lie (5 of clubs or 7 of spades)
- 2. Truth (5 of clubs or 7 of spades)
- 3. Recurrent distracter (2 of hearts)
- 4. Variant distracter (remaining cards, 2- 10 all suits)
- 5. Null (back of card)
- Cards were presented for 2 seconds followed by a variable (0 -16 s) during which the null card was shown.
- 24 Lie, Truth and recurrent distracter cards and 168 variant distracter cards were shown.
- Participants were instructed to press a left button (yes) to confirm that a card was in their possession or the right button (no) to deny it.
- In total, 432 stimuli were presented with a session length of 14.4 minutes.
- Results:
- No difference between those who reported using a strategy and those who reported using no strategy.
- "The key point is that you need to exercise a system that is in charge of regulating and controlling your behavior when you lie more than when you just say the truth," Langleben said. "Three areas of the brain generally become more active during deception: the anterior cingulated cortex, the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex and the parietal cortex."
1. The initial ACC and inferior parietal lobe findings are not replicated and the frontal activations described are of insufficient statistical significance to be reported by most neuroimaging groups (Z values of less than 3);
2.The parietal lobes (bilaterally) now exhibit greater activation during truthful responding than deceptive responding (c.f. Langleben et al., 2002); and
3.The behavioural and functional anatomical findings are reported differently across the 2005 papers: while truthful RTs appear only qualitatively longer than lie responses in Langleben et al. (2005), they are reported as significantly longer in Davazitkos et al. (2005); while very many regions exhibit greater activation during truthful responding in Langleben et al. (2005), a different subset of foci are maximally informative in Davazitkos et al. (2005; admittedly, following application of a different, and novel, analytic method)."
Conclusion
- Admits that brain activity previously associated with deception was driven by the task design
- Lie and Truth operate with a similar frontoparietal network, but lie still appears to be a more working-memory associated task
Langleben, et. al. Telling Truth From Lie in Individual Subjects With Fast Event-Related fMRI. University of Pennsylvania, 2005.
Federal Psycho-physiological Detection Of Deception Examiner Handbook. COUNTERINTELLIGENCE FIELD ACTIVITY TECHNICAL MANUAL October 2,2006
Temple-Raston. Neuroscientist Uses Brain Scan to See Lies Form. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15744871. NPR, 2009.
Spence, Sean. Playing Devil's Advocate: The Case against fMRI Lie Detection. Legal and Criminal Psychology (2008) 13, 11-25. The British Psychological Society, 2008.
Friday, April 24, 2009
Chelsey Article
here is the link ot my article...
http://discovermagazine.com/2008/jun/16-could-an-acid-trip-cure-your-ocd
http://discovermagazine.com/2008/jun/16-could-an-acid-trip-cure-your-ocd
Monday, April 13, 2009
Religious Relaxation
When God Makes a Difference
The study conducted by McGregor, Nash, and Hirsh was based around the idea that religious conviction provided a level of certainty and relief from error, which allows those who are strong believers to ignore the inconsistencies that cause people anxiety. Their hypothesis stated that there was a neurophysiological reason for this decrease in anxious feelings, lying in the reduction of activity in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex.
What’s up the ACC?
The Anterior Cingulate Cortex or ACC is a part of the forebrain located at the frontal part of the cingulated cortex, which lies above the corpus callosum. The ACC is a part of a variety of autonomic functions including blood pressure and heart rate as well as some processes involved in language production and acquisition as we’ve read about in the most recent T. Deacon chapters. However in this study the focus lay on the role of the ACC in more rational cognitive processes such as reward and anticipation and their role in the generation of anxious feelings. Much of the ACCs involvement in error processing lies in its activity in comparing what the intended outcome of a situation is and the actual out come, the ACC responds to an error by aiding in the production of anxious feelings, which allow the subject to become both consciously and physically aware of the error.
The ACC is connected to the prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, and motor system. It is thus connected to the general system for regulating and modifying behavior. This regulation occurs in reaction to various anxiety producing events such as “the omission of error, the detection of conflict, or the experience of uncertainty.” They believe this to be true because those who are deeply involved in religion have provided for themselves a set of predictive guidelines for the world and occurrences therein. Religions provide meaning systems and moral parameters that the practitioner may operate within they are essentially guides for action and the perception of the actions of others. Anxiety is often caused by a dissonance between the expected action or situation and what actually occurs, those who seriously practice religion however are given rules that “constrain thought and perception away from discrepant or erroneous predictions”, they are able to ignore that which does not fit the teachings of their religion. The conscious reinterpretation of out of the religious box events into preexisting convictions acts as a sort of natural anti-anxiety medication, deadening the ACCs alarm bell for errors.
Study #1
The first study used twenty-eight subjects who came from Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, and other religious backgrounds (including non-religious). The researchers had them complete scaled that measured their personality, need for cognitive closure, behavioral inhibition and activation, as well as on their religious zeal. The religious zeal scale, on which they focused, had items that ranged from “I aspire to live and act according to my religious beliefs” to “I would support a war that defended my religious beliefs”. The participants were given a Stroop test, which consisted of a series of color words, each presented in a color that either matched or mismatched the meaning of the word. They were asked to respond to each word by pressing a button that either matched the color of the word or the color the word represented.
To determine the ACC activity they measured event-related potential “which reflects the summation of the postsynaptic potentials of a large ensemble of synchronously active neurons” called the errorealted negativity or ERN. “The ERN is a sharp negative voltage deflection that typically peaks within 50 to 100 ms postresponse and reflects the preconscious monitoring of error, conflict, and uncertainty localized to the ACC “
The results showed that those who were more religiously zealous had less ERN activity, when an error was made the ACC did not react so strongly that they had a feeling of anxiety or any related emotion in making a mistake. They also found that the more zealous a participant was the less errors they made, they were more deliberate and careful in their answers. However the more zealous participants also answered questions faster suggesting a higher level of automatic thoughts, which allow them to answers quickly with more certainty.
Study #2
The second study consisted of twenty-two participants whose religious preferences were not recorded. They were asked to complete a scale on their belief in God as well as an IQ test and the Big Five inventory, which measures five broad categories of personality traits. They also completed a similar Stroop test.
The results of the second study revealed, just as in the first, that a stronger belief in God led to les ERN activity as well as less incorrect answers. Having belief in God is most certainly a less intense form of religious zeal, however this did not diminish the fact that the participants had less anxiety related activity in their ACC.
These results suggest that religious conviction provides a framework for understanding and behavioral activity in the world, thus acting as a buffer against the anxiety provoking situations as well as “minimizing the experience of error”.
Though these studies are based around religious constructs there is a strong possibility that conviction to any ideology could provide similar results.
Carter CS, Braver TS, Barch DM, Botvinick MM, Noll D, Cohen JD. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 1998; 280: 747–9.
MacDonald, Angus W., et al. "Dissociating the Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Cognitive Control." Science 288.5472 (2000): 1835-8.
The study conducted by McGregor, Nash, and Hirsh was based around the idea that religious conviction provided a level of certainty and relief from error, which allows those who are strong believers to ignore the inconsistencies that cause people anxiety. Their hypothesis stated that there was a neurophysiological reason for this decrease in anxious feelings, lying in the reduction of activity in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex.
What’s up the ACC?
The Anterior Cingulate Cortex or ACC is a part of the forebrain located at the frontal part of the cingulated cortex, which lies above the corpus callosum. The ACC is a part of a variety of autonomic functions including blood pressure and heart rate as well as some processes involved in language production and acquisition as we’ve read about in the most recent T. Deacon chapters. However in this study the focus lay on the role of the ACC in more rational cognitive processes such as reward and anticipation and their role in the generation of anxious feelings. Much of the ACCs involvement in error processing lies in its activity in comparing what the intended outcome of a situation is and the actual out come, the ACC responds to an error by aiding in the production of anxious feelings, which allow the subject to become both consciously and physically aware of the error.
The ACC is connected to the prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, and motor system. It is thus connected to the general system for regulating and modifying behavior. This regulation occurs in reaction to various anxiety producing events such as “the omission of error, the detection of conflict, or the experience of uncertainty.” They believe this to be true because those who are deeply involved in religion have provided for themselves a set of predictive guidelines for the world and occurrences therein. Religions provide meaning systems and moral parameters that the practitioner may operate within they are essentially guides for action and the perception of the actions of others. Anxiety is often caused by a dissonance between the expected action or situation and what actually occurs, those who seriously practice religion however are given rules that “constrain thought and perception away from discrepant or erroneous predictions”, they are able to ignore that which does not fit the teachings of their religion. The conscious reinterpretation of out of the religious box events into preexisting convictions acts as a sort of natural anti-anxiety medication, deadening the ACCs alarm bell for errors.
Study #1
The first study used twenty-eight subjects who came from Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, and other religious backgrounds (including non-religious). The researchers had them complete scaled that measured their personality, need for cognitive closure, behavioral inhibition and activation, as well as on their religious zeal. The religious zeal scale, on which they focused, had items that ranged from “I aspire to live and act according to my religious beliefs” to “I would support a war that defended my religious beliefs”. The participants were given a Stroop test, which consisted of a series of color words, each presented in a color that either matched or mismatched the meaning of the word. They were asked to respond to each word by pressing a button that either matched the color of the word or the color the word represented.
To determine the ACC activity they measured event-related potential “which reflects the summation of the postsynaptic potentials of a large ensemble of synchronously active neurons” called the errorealted negativity or ERN. “The ERN is a sharp negative voltage deflection that typically peaks within 50 to 100 ms postresponse and reflects the preconscious monitoring of error, conflict, and uncertainty localized to the ACC “
The results showed that those who were more religiously zealous had less ERN activity, when an error was made the ACC did not react so strongly that they had a feeling of anxiety or any related emotion in making a mistake. They also found that the more zealous a participant was the less errors they made, they were more deliberate and careful in their answers. However the more zealous participants also answered questions faster suggesting a higher level of automatic thoughts, which allow them to answers quickly with more certainty.
Study #2
The second study consisted of twenty-two participants whose religious preferences were not recorded. They were asked to complete a scale on their belief in God as well as an IQ test and the Big Five inventory, which measures five broad categories of personality traits. They also completed a similar Stroop test.
The results of the second study revealed, just as in the first, that a stronger belief in God led to les ERN activity as well as less incorrect answers. Having belief in God is most certainly a less intense form of religious zeal, however this did not diminish the fact that the participants had less anxiety related activity in their ACC.
These results suggest that religious conviction provides a framework for understanding and behavioral activity in the world, thus acting as a buffer against the anxiety provoking situations as well as “minimizing the experience of error”.
Though these studies are based around religious constructs there is a strong possibility that conviction to any ideology could provide similar results.
Carter CS, Braver TS, Barch DM, Botvinick MM, Noll D, Cohen JD. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 1998; 280: 747–9.
MacDonald, Angus W., et al. "Dissociating the Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Cognitive Control." Science 288.5472 (2000): 1835-8.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)